Tuesday, April 21, 2026
A Little Follow-Up
Monday, April 20, 2026
First Person POV? A Bit Hard, Even for A Good Book
When I started reading Robin McKinley’s “Dragonhaven,” it made me angry.
First of all, first person. Not my favorite point of view for a book. I’m hard-wired a bit to avoid that.
Second of all, the voice. Very scattered. Very slow to come to the point.
But I suppose, after finishing the book, that was the point.
The protagonist is, of course, young. And while versed in many things related to dragons, not really versed in writing.
So the longer I read, the more the point of view and the voice fit. Yes, at times, it was like trying to read one of my younger students’ essays, typical stream of consciousness garble that they usually are. They wear me out. Sometimes you have to read a paragraph, or a series of paragraphs, over and over again to get the gist, and even then you’re not really sure.
That’s what this book felt like, start to finish. Not necessarily how I would have done it, but clearly McKinley made a choice and she stuck with it. It certainly lent her character a unique voice.
I worried at times, however, that the voice got in the way of the story. I can be a demanding reader, and this story demanded a bit more than I actually got.
Remembering the main character’s name? Really hard to do. I got it in the last 40 or so pages.
Being able to tell but a few characters apart? Not really. That was hard, but as the POV is written from kind of an egocentric point of view, maybe that’s mission accomplished.
I’ve read a few other McKinley books and will stick with those. This one tells a good story, but the approach to it was a bit too grating for me to get into it.
Don't get me wrong: This is a good story, telling an interesting tale. McKinley is a strong writer, rich in dragon lore that's historic and contemporary and a bit of her own invention. I just had a hard time with the approach, that's all.
Sunday, April 19, 2026
Are They Even Paying Attention?
The Salt Lake Tribune recently published an article claiming some in the LDS Church have "Pope envy," in which they ask why our church leadership isn't speaking out against war, like Pope Leo.
In all due respect, it's clear these were not paying attention during April Conference.
So many talks about peacemakers and finding peace in Christ.
Our leaders don't have to specifically point out "this war," or "this action" is bad; that is baked ino the gospel of Christ.
This from President Oaks, said just a few weeks ago, suffices for me:
"Truly, Jesus Christ is the way to peace in this world and eternal life in the world to come. He knows and loves each of us perfectly and invites us to walk with Him, abide in Him, and follow His example of ministering to others one by one in charity and love. . . May we all demonstrate the pure love of Christ in our families, in our communities, and in all of our interactions with God’s children."
And he wasn't the only one.
This from Elder Eyring:
"The world today seems to be in commotion. There are wars and rumors of wars. The economies of whole continents seem to be faltering. Prophesied wickedness seems to be accelerating as the Savior’s return draws nearer.
"Yet despite turmoil and difficulty, faithful Latter-day Saints in hardship across the world have flooded heaven with prayers. In public and in private, they are petitioning the Lord for help, for comfort, for direction, and for personal peace for those they love."
I'm often confused by folks who criticize religion for mixing with politics, but then get upset when religion doesn't mix with politics in the way and in the time they think it should.
War is bad. It is rarely justifiable. The messages of peace that I hear again and again from church leaders affirms that to me
I applaud Pope Leo for speaking out as he did. I ask those who think our leaders should do likewise to pay attention to what they've been saying all along.
Saturday, April 18, 2026
Maybe We'll Get A *New* Nest
Friday, April 17, 2026
Warning: Teeth
Of course we have a clear little box with four teeth in it on our kitchen counter. Who doesn't?
They're Isaac's wisdom teeth, extracted this week. Yes, the same week he had to have surgery. It's been a tough week for him.
That's the Way it Was, with the Old Man
Back in 1976, when we were celebrating the bicentennial of the United States, we got stuff like this. Good ol' Darren McGavin, the Old Man himself, delivering real news, not that politic slop.
We also got crap like this, so it wasn't all good:
We're in a much, shall we say, stranger era today. We're post-irony, post-cynicism, and in places where we'd have "woke" spokespeople on one side of the 250th arguing with the non-woke on the other.
I don't know that we're any more polarized than we were in the 1970s, but we're certainly a lot louder about it.
Wednesday, April 15, 2026
Tired Guy Duty
So Isaac went into wound care this morning for a follow-up, and they decided they needed to do a little surgery. So he was in for day surgery. Michelle was with him up until about 1:30, but she had to go to the dentist for a root canal and crown, so I stayed with him that afternoon.
Sorry for the graphic photo. These are the burns on his abdomen, which had them concerned. So they put him under briefly, removed the dead tissue, then put on some cadaver skin as a temporary bandage as he heals.
So he had dead guy duty.
Tuesday, April 14, 2026
I Did This. A Little.
I don't get to talk a lot about the specifics on the work I do, but since the company published this, I guess I can blab a little.
I did indeed help on the paperwork to make this happen. I'm part of a group that writes and edits reports that are used to track waste like this from cradle to grave. It's challenging work, but I certainly enjoy it. Well, parts of it. Some of it bears the ickiness of any job, but you put up with a lot for a paycheck.
Oh, I Got Dead Again.
This is what you get from your laid-back son when he's doused with 185-degree water mixed with a caustic solution and has to go to the ER for treatment.
If anyone asks, he's fine. And ready to go back to work tomorrow.












