Beware the Bot Exhaustion

So, I think we're mostly aware that fake news - and fake news purveyors - are a real thing. And while the Venn diagram of such may occasionally include legitimate news outlets, the biggest problem by far are the Joe Six-Packs and Betty Housecoats we encounter on social media.

Only less dangerous than these are the actual real people who believe what the propaganda farm bots post and spread around.

That probably includes me. And you. Nobody is immune.

So we really, really need as individuals to be very careful in believing what we see online. As Benn Jordan says at the conclusion of this video:

"At this point in time, you should always be asking yourself if social media users or features are separating you from your own instincts or logical conclusions because this isn't political; the goal is not to make you support a particular party or candidate. The goal is to make you constantly question your own convictions by filling your entire world with conspiracy theories. The goal is to make educating yourself about your surroundings and questioning what's real or not so exhausting that you're too worn down to care that there's lead in your childrens' drinking water. You're too worn down to care that the American life expectancy has dropped below the average of some developing countries. What politically-oriented problems are bigger than those things?"

Media literacy has entered a new era, and we've got to be really vigilant lest we fail.

What an Odd Thing to Say

I can't read the New York Times story on this, but it sounds like an up-and-coming author won't be coming anymore as accusations of artificial intelligence use are being leveled at her and her work.

In sum, author Mia Ballard's "Shy Girl" - a horror novel outside my area of interest - might be as much as 78% written by artificial intelligence.

Of course, that's a dicey measurement.

AI detectors look at patterns to determine if writing is machine produced, using the same kind of large language models that AI uses, so there's lots of ickiness to go around. I teach at a university in its English department, and we're cautioned about using these AI-detectors as there are plenty of things that trigger the AI detectors that aren't necessarily AI.

I started watching the "Frankie's Shelf" video at this link from Jezebel, but as it clocks in at nearly three hours, there's no chance in hell I'm going to finish it all.

But the evidence presented is telling.

The cover on her self-published book was ripped off from another artist.

There's odd formatting issues throughout the book - something you might chalk up to the initial indie publishing of the story - and readings and analyses by sleuths from Goodreads to the New York Times detect AI patterns throughout.

The author, in her defense, claims it was a developmental editor who introduced AI to the story. And that seems an odd thing to say. Surely an author, whose reputation depends on the words he or she writes, would read anything doctored by an editor and notice enough differences to send up their own red flags before pushing that publish button.

Whether or not that's true should be easy to determine: A draft of the novel before the editor got it could be examined to see if it has the tells of artificial intelligence. I highly doubt that will come to pass.

And Hachette, her publisher in the UK and would-be publisher in the US, should have detected the AI, but clearly the idea of a new novel got in their eyes. Only after the NYT analysis did they pull the plug.

Cadfael for Writers

Yet another lucky find at the local thrift.

A good book for aspiring writers to read, as we get to see Cadfael, a beloved character, develop. We get to see Brother Jerome, fully developed in his righteous smarm. Peters used the stories in this book - in my opinion - to develop Cadfael as a character, bringing in other characters after Cadfael was fully formed. So very instructional.

And the stories are great, though the denouement of the third was a bit abrupt.

A Weasley Way to Meet Constituents

Mike Simpson, a word:

Got one of your robocalls tonight announcing RIGHT NOW RIGHT NOW RIGHT NOW you're doing a telephone town hall and that I should stay on the line to be connected to participate.

This kind of call is a fancy way to say "Hey, I *tried* to meet with my constituents, but, yanno, they didn't stay on the line to participate, so it's on them."

No, sir, it's on you.

You caught me at an inconvenient time. I was just heading into a Scout meeting and could not attend your telephone town hall, as much as I might want to do that.

If you're sincere in wanting to meet with your constituents - and of that I have my doubts - you'd schedule your telephone town halls enough in advance that your constituents could plan for them, not have to drop everything they're doing RIGHT NOW in the hopes of having the blessed opportunity of maybe possibly asking you a question as long as it's not too inconvenient to answer.

Representative Russ Fulcher schedules his telephone town halls and gives his constituents ample notice of them. You should learn from that example.

Do better, congressman. Do better.

NOTE: I sent him this in Facebook Messenger, and posted it on my wall. Will update if I get any response. Which I also doubt will happen.

Cranky Textee

 

Got this text last night.

I seriously hope my last missive was delivered, too, but I doubt it.

Why not respond to an anonymous - well, it's from "Sarah," so I guess it's not *totally* anonymous - text?

Because who are these people? Why do they want me, L.H. Puttgrass, Pundit for the People, to respond? Will they ask a bunch of questions and weed out any answers that don't fit with the narrative they're pushing? I don't know. But likely.

I'm sure they think telling us in advance who they are might spoil the answers they get, so that's why they're mum.

So they get nothing from me. There's so much dishonesty out there, and I'm a paranoid and suspicious bastard, so no thank you.

Ghosts of Nixon

This is the operative statement. All other statements are inoperative.

~Ron Ziegler

Why is our president such a maroon?

He Amused Himself with His Monkey, Part Infinite

 

I'm trying, book, but when you tell me characters are sitting around outside smoking and talking in one sentence and then in another not too far distant tell me there's enough rain and lightning there to menace the airplanes they're watching, I have a hard time paying attention to the story.

Some Give All

In the annals of bathroom remodels, some dog toys give all.

Our Carport Took A Trip on Mother Nature's Rocket Ship

So the carport I set up a few years ago - borrowed from Isaac - because I was tired of tripping over it in the garage and I needed more space for either workspace or to store crap, took a backflip over our fence today, thanks to some rather strong winds we've had over the last few days.

We had wind gusts of 75 mph on Thursday, and Liam and I had to go out to the carport that night to batten down the hatches.

This map is showing a gust of 58 mph for today, which I doubt was the biggest wind we had today.

The mess damaged our fence, breaking one of the fence upright and snapping an old post I kept from the old fence but clearly should have replaced. So now I get to do that this summer.

Low-Stakes Fakery. or is it?

Stumbled across this on the Facebooks this morning:

Sure, sure. The Idaho Potato Museum does exist. Its is indeed in Blackfoot.

However . . .

Most of what's in this photo is fake.

First of all, I don't believe this actual intersection exists, at least not in a location that would have this serious amount of directional signage on it.

Then there's the signage . . .

Blackfoot doesn't have a directional arrow.

US Highway 39 is in the east, specifically Alabama-Tennessee-Kentucky.

Nowhere in the national or state highway code are there red signs indicating states on highways.

Oh, and while there is a Highway 39 in the area, it's a state highway with a very distinct shield:

So this is clearly fake, for clicks. And that's annoying. Low-stakes annoying, yes, but annoying nonetheless. If people accept this kind of low-stakes fakery, how much fakery are we willing to accept?

This kind of fakery?

This one's a little better, but still obviously fakes. The incorrect shield for the state highway really stands out, as does the fake "TOURISM" sign and the wonderfully inconsistent, I guess that's supposed to indicate something about I-15 there? I'm not sure.

The real signage, for those interested:

They didn't steal his photo, but they did steal his text.

These kinds of things aren't hard to verify. But why verify, I can hear you screaming. The museum is real. Blackfoot exists. This is low-stakes.

Yes, it is low stakes. But they ratchet things up, you know. Accept l0w-stakes fakery and pretty soon you're swallowing something fake that's got a lot more import to it.

So beware.