Explain something to me:
Business A should do business with Person X because even
though Person X espouses a view that the owners of Business A don’t support,
Person X has the right and obligation to be served by Business A and the owners
of Business A are terrible, terrible people for refusing to do business with
Person X.
Business B, however, should NOT do business with Group Y
because Group Y espouses views that may not necessarily jibe with the culture
of Business B, but Business B regards a larger part of its culture as
obligating it to do business with Group Y which clearly has a right to be
served no matter what they believe. But because Group Z opposes what Group Y
espouses, Business B is a terrible, terrible business for refusing NOT to do
business with Group Y.
It’s happening here, folks.
This is the question I want answered: Should business be blind to the political and social proclivities of
potential customers, or should businesses be allowed to pick and choose
whom they serve based on those proclivities?
Also, I'm pretty sure Figure B has fallen asleep.
No comments:
Post a Comment