Fake News, but No Underpants

Hey, let’s MAKE some fake news.

So today on Facebook, this image – or rather the concealment thereof – gained a lot of traction:

The image revealed shows a pair of glasses bringing a flower growing up through a cobblestone street into focus, with blurred images of people milling about in the background.

There’s also an unattributed quote on the image: “Stand up for what you believe in even if you are standing alone.”

Outrage on the ‘book, of course, is rampant. Or at least there in some form, let’s not exaggerate.

Nefarious mischief of Facebook’s ban-happy algorithm is presented, without evidence, as the main culprit. Many people are begging the question: Why is Facebook banning this image? They don’t want us to stand up for what we believe in?”

My theory: This is a fake news banning fueled by someone or someone wanting to fuel anti-Facebook sentiment by using Facebook’s own tools against it.

Let’s break things down, first of all. Understanding what’s in the image might be helpful. I doubt it, but I’s fun figuring it out.

Let’s start with the quote. As far as I can tell, the quote is attributed to Sophie Scholl, an anti-Nazi activist who was executed in 1943 for passing out anti-war pamphlets in Munich. Whether or not she actually said it is up for debate. 

It’s quite possible she said something similar to this in German – her Wikipedia page includes the quote “Somebody, after all, had to make a start. What we wrote and said is also believed by many others. They just don't dare express themselves as we did,” which expresses a parallel sentiment. 

This direct quote is attributed to Andy Biersack, singer for the Black Veil Pirates.

And Suzy Kassem, who is not stuck on herself at all.

And Mikasa Ackerman, an anime character.

It’s also associated in many ways with Atticus Finch, protagonist of the novel “To Kill A Mockingbird.”

So clearly going to the Internets to find out who said this and why the sentiment might draw the ire of the Facebook censors is a dry well.

And the image?

Hard to tell. It has echoes of a few things I’m familiar with.

The glasses evoke this scene from the Battleship Potempkin, a Russian silent film from 1925.

(pertinent scene at 6:37)

The flower evokes this scene from Joe Versus the Volcano, a contemporary American film.

But images of flowers and glasses in similar contexts abound; certainly others could find instances familiar to them as well.

So let’s revisit that theory: Posting the image, well, that’s good and all, but it’s easily ignored. Get it banned, however, and it circulates due to the outrage machine Facebook is famous for.

Who benefits?

Hard to tell. People who don’t like Facebook, I guess.

But there’s more text on the photo: a URL: fb.com/mywhisperoftheheart

Go there and KABLOOIE more evidence of FACEBOOK CENSORSHIP.

The page isn’t there anymore, just this:

So the circle of conspiracy is complete.

Facbook’s less-than-transparent censorshipping of stuff doesn’t help. The original poster of this image might know what “community standard” the image violated, but clearly they’re not telling. And Facebook would only tell them in vague or indefinite terms – this is someone who’s spent time in Facebook Jail talking.

So is it easier to assume:

1. Something in this image is so violent and sinister that innocent Facebookers individually reported it enough times that it was banned.

2. Something in this image is a trigger for the snowflakes who jumped on the bandwagon of bannination.

3. The original poster of the image reported it and got enough friends to report it the image was banninated.

But who benefits? There seem to be no profit in this situation.