At the start of the year, I made a goal of 20 posts a month this year.
Though I'll make that goal by averages, by numbers August fell three posts short.
This blog has turned into a journal of sorts, not really intended for a wide audience. Yet here it is. I hope I post things that are occasionally of value or entertaining.
Seems fitting as I earn my keep at a federal facility cleaning up Cold War nuclear waste that we should visit a decommissioned Minuteman missile silo way out in the middle of nowhere.
Today in Rapid City, South Dakota, looking for Martin Landau or James Mason preparing for the final battle atop Mount Rushmore, and also looking for Richard M. Nixon among the city's presidential statuary.
At the location where Nixon was supposed to be, construction of a rather substantial building:
I am disappoint, I said.
But the son who suggested the visit found where he'd been moved, so I got to do this:
And thus:
I felt a tad underdressed there, with Nixon in his office/beach attire. But I got to see him.
I had to go out to RWMC today for a drill -- making that long trek out to the desert for I think only the second time this year.
They didn't offer a firm time for the drill, so I drove out first thing in the morning. I started looking for a turnaround office where I could work until the drill started, but thought I'd stop by my old cubicle first. It was empty, still had my name on the wall, and had a network cable, so I set up shop.
I probably shouldn't have. It was very dusty and I found some rodent droppings. But the drill started shortly after 8 am, so it didn't matter much.
I did reclaim a few personal posessions I left there back in 2020:
I did leave the newer sign hanging on the outside of the cubicle, but took this old one home.
Also this, which is ironic, as we'll be back at Wall Drug next week:
The drill went OK. I'm a little rusty in my position, but there are some counterintuitive things I had failed to remember with this bit of software I use. It doesn't make sense how they've set it up. Well, in a way it does, but in a way it doesn't.
Because I have a genetic propensity to hoard bulky objects (Dad firmly believed in the theory of home improvement by making the property heavier) I finally figured out how to shoehorn the carport I mentioned earlier onto the property. I have to get the roof on along with the rest of the walls, and move one of my woodpiles for the fourth time, but it's coming together.
Or I'm having a psychotic episode. Either way . . .
I am close to realizing my goal of a condensed wood pile -- the small pile next to the carport is going to be moved adjacent to the larger woodpile in the photo. I had thought about putting some in the carport to keep it out of the snow, but that would mean less space for the other junk that's clogging the garage right now.
The slot where the little woodpile is now is going to be home to our canoe once I've got things cleaned out.
I'm not necessarily bragging in that last photo -- it's just our collection of PVC resting in the window well of the study until I can get things cleaned up enough to move it. I have thought of converting it into a shelf for the storing of PVC, but if I build the shelf I no longer have any PVC to store, so it's a real pickle.
It started innocently enough, with an admonition that I get a life when I noted the only thing I did for fun yesterday was clean the gutter and sidewalk in front of the house.
But then, as things do occasionally on Facebook, it took a left turn.
It's best to illustrate with pictures.
Here's the reason for Dennis' test:
I don't know what they objected to. The words? My cropping? The red circle I drew around the unrepaired damage to Homer's foundation?
I'm at a loss to explain it.
Dennis sums up the situation perfectly, hence the title of this post:
I'm sure they've got artificial intelligence involved in this -- their "naughty boy" message was instantaneous with me clicking post. But there is no explanation of how this goes against community standards. Or what those standards are. Or how those standards can allow scam crypto ads and fake links that lead one to scam computer repair links to remain. Oh, because they're getting *paid* for those . . .
Update: I forgot to share the entire jpg I was sharing along with my pearl-clutching comment, in case that it what offended:
Reading in "Captain Bonneville's County," a history of Bonneville County written in 1963. They share this tidbit from 1879:
Once or twice a summer a bitter three-day wind howls up the valley. Contrary gusts pick up the sharp sand and backlash it in mockery. The cottonwood trees and the willows bend low, as if turning their backs to the chill. The whole landscape is grey and cowering, and, summer or not, the air is raw.
From a journal written ty Tomas Moran, famed artist who painted Yellowstone and the Grand Tetons in the era:
"August 21, 1879. Left Fort Hall with Captain A.H. Bainbridge and 20 men 2 wagons on way to Taylor bridge. Reached Taylors Brfidge [Idaho Falls] later in the afternoon 27 miles desolation. Abandoned town, railroad bridge over the Snake. Andersons store. Dismal camp. Furious wind all night. Driven sand everywhere almost blinding. Gray dismal morning. Black basalt abomination. Rushing river like Niagara Rapids.
"August 22. Left camp at Taylor's Bridge at 7 o'clock. Cold and windy with dust following and blinding us all the way."
We now have a thunderstorm blowing in, and that wind, which comes only "once or twice a summer" is here.
Good to hear more than a century and a half of settlement and growth hasn't stopped the wind from blowing.
To sum up: A newspaper reporter used artificial intelligence to write stories, including fabricating quotes from people who on subsequent questioning said they'd never spoken to the guy.
Job is gone.
If you're going to use artificial intelligence in your professional life, rethinkg your approach and don't use it. Or use it judiciously. And disclose its use.
The Associated Press takes pains in the linked story to describe how journalists use AI -- in fairly vague terms -- but they also explain it's advisable to disclose how it's used.
In many ways, I miss the frontier days of the Internet.
Yes, waiting for twenty minutes while our slow service buffered a video from the likes of JibJab or Stupid Videos was a pain. And yet -- when the buffering was done, we got our video and that was that.
Right now I'm using the Brave browser exclusively as a YouTube video watcher, because to watch YouTube with anything else means having to install ad blockers and disable them from time to time when Google gets tired of subsidising my video watching.
I understand someone has to pay the bills. There are vast computers somewhere storing all of that video content, and the electricity to run them and the (maybe) salaries they pay the maintainers aren't cheap.
But I went to Brave when Google again put the thumb screws to ad blocking and interrupted an 11-minute video with a 14-minute unskippable commercial.
I should be willing to watch an ad or two to help keep the lights on.
Google should read the room and not drop commercials that are longer than the video being watched.
Another disadvantage: I'm not signed in to anything on Brave, meaning I have to manually keep up with the channels I like to watch, and I can't like or comment on anything. I don't want to sign in because I assume in some way that's going to bring up the entire ad conundrum again if I do.
So content creators don't get the likes they want from bums like me, viz:
And that makes me feel bad. I mean, not bad enough to go back to using other browsers or signing in, but bad enough. I guess I should donate to their channels or something.
Or maybe Google could stick to their fifteen-second ads. I mean, I'm Gen X and grew up watching ads on broadcast TV, so I'm used to commercial breaks. But I'm also from the Gen X whose families did not pay for cable. I wasn't able to use the Internet on a regular basis until I left home and went to college.
Yesterday I drove up to Island Park to tow the utility trailer home, marking the (almost) end of the Island Park Scout Camp season for my family. I say almost because Michelle will head up there for two (or possibly) three days to assist with groups wanting to use the camp's zipline.
It's nice to have them home, though it does mean that I again have to start maintenance and repair work on the camper again. Not looking forward to that. Still trying to track down an elusive roof leak in the rear bathroom area. I've also decided this fall I'm going to remove the water pump so we don't lose another one. I think the one we had in there before -- only about two or three years old -- got zapped by a sudden freeze that came after Michelle had the camper up in Island Park for the season. It's always dicey to think summer is going to come there as soon as it comes here in the valley.
I've also got to spend some time tinkering with her jeep brakes, as they failed completely after a fellow camper drove it around with the emergency brake on. I suspect some cooked brake pads, but I'll have to take a closer look.
I'm preparing to read "Captain Bonneville's County," a book of local history by Edith Haroldsen Lowell, and just with the introduction here, I can tell I'm not ready to encounter the truths therein.
I'm not very far into the book, but if the writing holds up, I think this'll be a much better book on local history than the one I read a few weeks ago.
This book was a lucky find at a local thrift store. I'm a space program junkie so anything with "moon" in the title will catch my eye, and when I spotted the three names on the cover, buying the book was a no-brainer.
I didn't know if I'd learn anything new about the Apollo program reading the book, but I was wrong.
Remember that scene in "The Right Stuff," where Alan Shepard is shamed in the hospital for liking Bill Dana and his "Cowardly Astronaut" routine, and it's implied after the shaming (or maybe not; it could be just me) he never liked the humor again?
Wrong.
Turns out Shepard and several other astronauts became friends with Dana and acted as straight men in some privately-performed versions of the skits.
Does that make them racist?
I don't think so. I don't necessarily believe racism was a core part of Dana's humor either. But, yanno, times change and such.
An aside: Dana wrote this episode of "All in the Family." That that for what you will.
(I could be told I'm wrong, but I believe the conversations about race in the 1970s were a bit more honest and straighforward than the ones we have today.)
But back to the book.
There are a few passages that make this book unique among those I've read about the Apollo program. You can tell it was written by actual astronauts. I love, for example, these bits:
"Punching through maximum aerodynamic pressure was another adventure as enormous forces squeezed and shook the Saturn 1B. Vibration pummelled the entire rocket and the Apollo. Then, suddenly, they were through Max Q, and they shot upward like a frightened jack rabbit. Almost at once, now into the supersonic region, engine roar and the high-pitched howl of air dripping past the rocket vanished.
"While the noise of the liftoff abated, the booster complained with deep. hollow groans and the craking of an old wooden ship wallowing in rough seas. Finally came the burnout of the first stage. For a precious moment the creaks, groans, willges, shaking,vibration, and other unpleasantness were gone."
Quite a description of the sudden changes observed when a craft passes through the sound barrier.
Not credited on the cover are two co-authors, Jay Barbee, a space correspondent for NSAS and Howard Benedict, an AP aerospace writer. I have to imagine their input on the book was invaluable. And maybe could have been used on the books' final chapters which really wandered a bit and were not as tightly-written as the rest. Maybe the subject matter -- the buildup to the Apollo-Soyuz mission and the mission itself -- just wasn't as exciting to me as the rest, but the writing felt a little lackluster.
Indy and Harry
-
We're heavily into many things at our house, as is the case with many
houses. So here are the fruits of many hours spent with Harry Potter and
Indiana Jone...
Here at the End of All Things
-
And another book blog is complete.
Oh, Louis Untermeyer includes a final collection of little bits -- several
pages of insults -- but they're nothing I hav...
Here at the End of All Things
-
I’ve pondered this entry for a while now. Thought about recapping my
favorite Cokesbury Party Blog moments. Holding a contest to see which book
to roast he...
History of Joseph Smith, by His Mother, by Lucy Mack Smith. 354 pages.
History of Pirates, A: Blood and Thunder on the High Seas, by Nigel Cawthorne. 240 pages.
Peanuts by the Decade, the 1970s; by Charles Schulz. 490 pages
Star Bird Calypso's Run, by Robert Schultz. 267 pages.
There's Treasure Everywhere, by Bill Watterson. 173 pages.
Read in 2024
92 Stories, by James Thurber. 522 pages.
A Rat's Tale, by Tor Seidler. 187 pages.
Blue Lotus, The, by Herge. 62 pages.
Book Thief, The; by Markus Zusack. 571 pages.
Born Standing Up, by Steve Martin. 209 pages.
Captain Bonneville's County, by Edith Haroldsen Lovell. 286 pages.
Case of the Condemned Cat, The; by E. W. Hildick. 138 pages.
Catch You Later, Traitor, by Avi. 296 pages.
Diary of A Wimpy Kid: Big Shot, by Jeff Kinney. 217 pages.
Edward R. Murrow and the Birth of Broadcast Journalism, by Bob Edwards. 174 pages.
Exploring Idaho's Past, by Jennie Rawlins. 166 pages.
Forgotten 500, The; by Gregory A. Freeman. 313 pages.
I Must Say: My Life as A Humble Comedy Legend, by Martin Short and David Kamp; 321 pages.
Joachim a des Ennuis, by J.J. Sempe and Rene Goscinny, 192 pages.
Le petit Nicolas et des Copains, by J.J. Sempe and Rene Goscinny, 192 pages.
Moon Shot: The Inside Story of America's Race to the Moon, by Alan Shepard and Deke Slayton; 383 pages.
Number Go Up, by Zeke Faux. 280 pages.
Peanuts by the Decade: The 1960s, by Charles Schulz. 530 pages.
Red Rackham's Treasure, by Herge. 62 pages.
Secret of the Unicorn, The; by Herge. 62 pages.
Sonderberg Case, The; by Elie Wiesel. 178 pages.
Squirrel Seeks Chipmunk, by David Sedaris. 159 pages.
Stranger, The; by Albert Camus. 155 pages.
Tintin in Tibet, by Herge. 62 pages.
Truckers, by Terry Pratchett. 271 pages.
Vacances du petit Nicolas, Les; by J.J. Sempe and Rene Goscinny, 192 pages.
World According to Mister Rogers, The; by Fred Rogers. 197 pages.
Ze Page Total: 6,381.
The Best Part
Catch You Later, Traitor, by Avi
“Pete,” said Mr. Ordson, “we live in a time of great mistrust. This is not always a bad thing. People should question things. However, in my experience, too much suspicion undermines reason.”
I shook my head, only to remember he couldn’t see me.
“There’s a big difference,” he went on, “between suspicion and paranoia.”
“What’s . . . paranoia?”
“An unreasonable beliefe that you are being persecuted. For example,” Mr. Ordson went on,” I’m willing to guess you’ve even considered me to be the informer. After all, you told me you were going to follow your father. Perhaps I told the FBI.”
Startled, I stared at him. His blank eyes showed nothing. Neither did his expression. It was as if he had his mask on again.
“Have you considered that?” he pushed.
“No,” I said. But his question made me realize how much I’d shared with him. Trusted him. How he’d become my only friend. And he was the only one I hoad told I was going to follow my dad. Maybe he did tell the FBI.
He said, “I hope you get my point.”
Silcence settled around us. Loki looked around, puzzled.
Mr. Ordson must have sensed what I was thinking because he said, “Now, Pete, you don’t really have any qualms about me, do you?”
Yes, perlious times then. Who to trust? And perlious times now, with paranoia running even deeper than during the Red Scare . . .