While I’m happy to hear that improvements are coming quickly
to the intersection of Hitt Road and 17th Street, I have some
concerns with the project’s apparent lack of support by the City of Ammon.
How can I say the city isn’t supporting the project when the
city has committed $1 million to it? Well, this little snippet from the PostRegister tells me something:
(Apologies if you can’t read the link; sometimes they’re
free, sometimes they’re not.)
The northern, western and southern legs of the intersection
will be expanded to include two through lanes, two dedicated left turn lanes
and one dedicated right turn lane each. There will be fewer improvements to the
eastern leg of the intersection in Ammon.
Now, maybe the lack of improvements on the Ammon leg have to
do with property acquisition. Or maybe the lack of improvements on the Ammon
leg have to do with the City of Ammon not putting enough money into the
project.
I don’t have enough information to answer either question.
Perhaps those in the know can shed a bit of light on the situation.
I just know as a regular user of both this intersection and
the intersection at Hitt and Sunnyside, it’s the intersection at Hitt and
Sunnyside I prefer – because it has the two-two-one configuration that three
legs of the Hitt/17th intersection will have.
And while the improvements planned at Hitt and 17th
are sorely needed and will make using that intersection much easier, I have to
wonder why the Ammon leg is being left out.
City of Ammon, can we get an answer?
My question has less to do with the typical sniping between
the cities and city residents over the perception/reality that Ammon pays less
than its fair share for improvements on Hitt Road. As the Post Register points
out, the road is the dividing line between the city – but Idaho Falls lays
claim to the road itself. If Idaho Falls residents have complaints about how
costs are divided along the road, perhaps they ought to ask their own city
council about this arrangement.
No comments:
Post a Comment