Tuesday, January 31, 2023

Play With Words

Play with words, folks.

Even if you and words don't get along. Dig them out of your head and put them on paper. Doesn't matter if you type them, or scribble them, or don't think they're good enough, or make enough sense, or are in the right order.

Record your memories. If that's the only thing you can do to play worth words, do it. It's a start. Maybe you want to do something more grand. That's always possible. But don't forget those stupid little moments, the sappy ones, the ones that maybe come up once in a while and you think about. If they keep coming back, they want a way out so others can experience them.

Tonight I'm getting a little weepy over a bit of pop-synth from the late 1980s, because a student wrote about how the song made her reconsider the rocky relationship she was building with her parents.  Her dad introduced the song to her, and for a long time she considered it to be one worthy of listening to with a plate of pancakes to catch the syrup with.

But then she got to thinking about it. Listened to it. And reconsidered her approach to her parents, and the lessons these silly, stupid people were trying to teach her.

One of the comments I made on her paper is long the lines of "I wonder why we're so slow to express gratitude?" and the thought came to me immediately: "Hey, dummy. When was the last time you expressed gratitude toward someone else?"

I dunno. I guess a long time. I'd better fix that.

As it says in Doctrine and Covenants 109:

"And as all have not faith, seek ye diligently and teach one another words of wisdom; yea, seek ye out of the best books words of wisdom, seek learning even by study and also by faith;

"Organize yourselves; prepare every needful thing, and establish a house, even a house of prayer, a house of fasting, a house of faith, a house of learning, a house of glory, a house of order, a house of God."

Add to the "best books" "The Living Years," by Mike and the Mechanics. Because a student did, I now will too.


Monday, January 30, 2023

#BumsStuffedWithTweed

I begin to wonder if artificial intelligence is the biggest threat we have to good writing.


I honestly can't tell if these two are being facetious or not. And now I worry that using a word like "facetious" makes me appear facetious. Anyway, if anyone thinks these are examples of good writing, they had better re-think their thinking thing.

Sunday, January 29, 2023

Winston Churchill: Fodder for the Tenth Ripping Yarn


(Fanfare used for the opening of Ripping Yarns, available on YouTube.)

Michael Palin and Terry Jones produced a series called "Ripping Yarns" for the BBC. Only nine episodes long, the show parodied the types of adventure stories Palin and so many others enjoyed reading in their school days, stuffed with clever Brits who always come out on top, whether they're fighting the natives, curses borne from mystic objects, or the school bully -- called School Bully -- at their public schools.

As I read Robert Lewis Taylor's biography of Churchill, "Winston Churchill, an Informal Study of Greatness," I kept thinking, story after story, "This could be a Ripping Yarn, and not even need the Palin/Jones comedic treatment.

An example:

Of his time at Harrow, and of an interaction with headmaster Welldon, Taylor writes: "The doctor's forbearance is the more admirable in view of Churchill's attitude toward him, which was, charitably, offhand. At one time, haled into the headmaster's study, the boy was told, "Churchill, I have very grave reason to be displeased with you." the unpenitent reply was, according to excellent sources, "And I, sirt, have very grave reason to be displeased with you.

Another:

One evening in Churchill's home, Michael Collins, the leader of Sinn Fein, blew up and began to rant of Britain's having once placed a price of $50,000 on his head. he abused Churchill with variety and fervor. The Colonial Secretary listened throughout with respectful attention, then, during an unexpected lull, stepped into his study and brought out a framed sample of the Boers' 25-pound reward after his escape from Pretoria. "If you were offended at the price on your head, imagine how I must feel," he told Collins, who relaxed, started to laugh, and kept it up most of the evening. Speaking of the newly created Irish Free State, or Eire, Collins afterward said, "Tell Winston we could never have done anything without him." Two days later he was struck down and killed by the gunfire of Dublin extremists.

The book is filled with these little tidbits and asides, helping it make up for a severe lack, wherein Churchill's time during World War II is given short shrift. The only thing I can think -- Taylor doesn't say -- would be that the World War II era is covered thoroughly elsewhere, and to do it any great justice would require many more pages than what Taylor used. But I don't know.

Still, it's a cleverly-written introduction to the man, likely containing little stories that would be overshadowed in more World War II-heavy tomes. Worth the read for the humor alone.

Note: This is my second copy of the book, as the first copy has a printing error.

Saturday, January 28, 2023

Better than A Chiropractor


This is what it sounds like when Venture Scouts talk their 51-year-old leader into sledding down the track with the mini jumps on it.

Wednesday, January 25, 2023

Ring Camera: Less Than Whelmed

My wife got me a Ring camera doorbell for Christmas.

Put it up four weeks ago. It captured exciting action like this:


Yes, not riveting stuff.

I have a lot to learn about it. Just today, I learned that the chime I hear when a new event occurs is not the wind chime on the front porch, but a sound effect from the camera.

But now I am Ring planless, meaning if anything happens out the front door and I don't see it live, then I get a notification that there was "motion," or whatnot, but no video.

At 3:51 am, there was "motion," but I couldn't see what it was.

I doubt there was motion. I think it's Amazon trying to spook me into buying a plan.

Which I might. But I'm irritated. The basic use shouldn't be limited to live, happening-now. I got that with the three-dollar doorbell the Ring replaced.

Sunday, January 22, 2023

My Wife: I Think I'll Keep Her

A week ago, I wrote about my chagrin upon discovering a printing error in a book I was reading.

I put out an appeal to others who might have read the book to see if they could pass the missing pages on to me, but as I suspected, that request got no responses. Which is fine. We're all busy, and maybe didn't feel like sending a PDF of pages out of a book to an internet stranger was a good idea. I get it.

My wife, however, listened. She got me the book used via the internet for Christmas 2021, and felt bad the copy was bad. So she went to the ol' internets and found another copy, had it shipped, and presented it to me today.

So I got to read all about Winson Churchill's rather minor exploits during World War I. I'm thrilled beyond belief.


(Pertinent bit starts at about 20:00 in; Margaret Thatcher campaign commercial.)


Monday, January 16, 2023

Avoid Suspicious Pusrchases


Scammers, a word:

1. This is not a valid T-Mobile email address.

2. While this is the company name, it is not the company logo.

3. Spellcheck can be your friend.

4. Omitting words is not a good look.

5. This is not how T-Mobile presents itself in text.

But people fall for this crap, I guess. It's not hard, however, to pause for even fifteen seconds to see there are  enough flaws here to suggest SCAM.

Also, while we do use T-Mobile as our service provider, my email address isn't in the mix. Oops.

And look what popped up on the ol' Google when I searched for "dbw mail":

Sunday, January 15, 2023

Perhaps Abigail Porterfield Is to Blame . . .


This is mildly infuriating. A printing error in my copy of Robert Lewis Taylor's "Winston Churchill: An Informal Study in Greatness" has reproduced pages 53 through 84 in place of pages 277 through 308. This makes me very cross.

A Facebook friend suggests it's Abigail Porterfield to blame:



The Most Interesting Ensemble in the Room

Day 1. Wear a stupid hat and cape.

Day 2. The Power of Love, and other Huey Lewis tunes.

Day 3. Is *that* your body?

Day 4. Rich Dad, Poor Dad, Beggar Dad, Thief.

Day 5. The Hawaii 5-0 Habit.

Day 6. The Power of Love and other Huey Lewis tunes, Part 2.

Day 7. Really, you Have to Update Your Wardrobe So You Look Like a Clean Chimney Sweep,Tiny Tim All Growed Up, or an Extra in a Nicholas Cage Film.

Day 8. Wicker.

Day 9. Super Man and other Topics to Drone on About.

Day 10. Limitless Within the Context of Your Vast Limitations.

Day 11. Think and Grow Fungus.

Day 12. QUIET! Communicating the Animal Way.

Day 13. Elon Musk and other Rich Tools.

Day 14. The WD-40 Principle.

Day 15. 31 Baskin Robbins.

Day 16. Only Idiots Get Up at 5 am.

Day 17. Leaning In: The Joe Fusco Jr. Story.

Day 18. Never Eat an Entire Little Caesar's Pizza on your own.



Saturday, January 14, 2023

AI -- and Mercury -- are in Retrograde

A response to a post about artificial intelligence writing blog posts, or summat:


A weird world indeed, Miss Bombski. A weird world indeed.


ChatGPT has this to say about Capricorns when Mercury is in retrograde. So maybe beware:

Mercury in retrograde is a phenomenon that occurs several times a year, during which the planet appears to be moving in the opposite direction of its normal orbit. This can have significant effects on all zodiac signs, but for Capricorns, it can be particularly challenging.

Capricorns are known for their practicality, hard work, and determination. They are ambitious and driven, and they often have a clear vision of what they want to achieve in life. However, when Mercury is in retrograde, it can disrupt their plans and cause delays and setbacks.

During this time, Capricorns may find that their communication is not as clear or effective as usual. They may struggle to get their point across or to understand others. This can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts, both at work and in personal relationships.

Additionally, Mercury in retrograde can cause confusion and indecision. Capricorns may find it hard to make decisions or to stick to their plans. This can make it difficult for them to move forward and achieve their goals.

To minimize the impact of Mercury in retrograde on their lives, Capricorns should take extra care with their communication and be patient with delays and setbacks. They should also try to stay flexible and open to new opportunities, rather than getting stuck in their usual ways of thinking.

In conclusion, Capricorns should be cautious during the time when mercury is in retrograde. They may face hindrances in their communication, decision-making, and may struggle to achieve their goals. But, with patience, flexibility and open-mindedness, they can navigate through the phase with minimal effect on their personal and professional lives.

Tuesday, January 10, 2023

Conclusion II: Also Inconclusive

In the interest of science (cue Dexter) I conducted a little experiment on Facebook, using my friends as guinea pigs.


As I explain in my post (linked here) I asked my friends to post a bit of writing, either from them, from a friend, or created by AI. I'd then use Edward Tian's AI language detector to do some detectoring.

Results were . . . mixed.

This experiment is hardly conclusive, but it's clear Tian's AI detector has trouble with "creative" writing (most of my friends who participated are published authors, in the publishing business, or extremely well-read). The detector consistently failed to differentiate between "creative" AI writing and human-originated writing. It got it right a few times, but more often than not, it failed.

Admittedly, some of the samples included were a bit short for the AI to chew on -- but there were bits in the middle-range of length that the detector basically said "I don't know. Not enough information here," while it confidently identified shorter texts as AI- or human-generated, both right and wrong.

What does this mean? I don't know. But it's interesting. I'll give it that.

Monday, January 9, 2023

Conclusion: Inconclusive

I finally had a few minutes to play around with Edward Tian’s AI-written text detector (explained here). The results leave me satisfied that, under the right conditions, AI-written text can be detected.

But I received enough errors from the analyzer to surmise Tian and those like him have a bit to go before the detection is reliable enough to be useful.

I tried Tian’s detector with five different bits of text:

1. Text generated by AI, which I copied and pasted into a Word document (seen here) and rearranged slightly to make a coherent essay (by rearranged, I mean I re-ordered the paragraphs. I did not alter the text at all).

2. A smaller portion of the same AI-generated text.

3. A portion of an essay I wrote a few years ago on the same subject I tasked the AI to write about.

4. An excerpt from a short story I wrote earlier this week

5. An excerpt from an essay submitted by one of my English students last semester.

Here are the results:

1. Tian’s GPTZero returned a cryptic error (see sample below).

2. Successfully identified the text as AI-generated.

3. Successfully identified the text as human-generated.

4. Successfully identified the text as human-generated.

5. Returned a cryptic error, similar to the sample already mentioned.

I suspect one source of the errors could be metadata carried over by the copy/paste from Microsoft Word, though I did get the errors when I pasted normally and when I pasted with the plain text option.

I’d like to keep conducting experiments with this website, using text I’m unfamiliar with, and certainly using text I’m unsure is AI-generated or not. I’ll keep playing with this, and see if the error rate goes down, or if I can figure out what is causing the errors. On the surface of it, I can see less-cryptic errors would be beneficial.

And with only two tests to differentiate between human and AI, there are likely ways those who want to cheat using AI can game the detector. Of the two, “perplexity,” as explained in the linked article, is a bit cryptic; I’m not exactly sure what AI finds perplexing. And “burstiness,” or variation of sentences in complexity and length, seems easy to game, though you have to suspect it might have to be humans gaming rather than AI, at least for the time being. 

While I’m interested to see where this technology goes (both in AI-generated text and in AI-text-detection, I’m more interested in the general reaction I’m seeing locally from English teachers. The consensus seems to be that we’ll eventually be able to detect it on a consistent basis, and that nothing we’re doing in our courses should change to counter AI text development.

While cheating cheaters will always cheat, I’ve seen from experience that students get more out of writing assignments they’re invested in, rather than just another run-of-the-mill ivory tower essay. But that’s just me using new technological developments to drag out the same ol’ soapbox, so maybe take what I say with a grain of salt.


Saturday, January 7, 2023

Thirteen


“Thirteen.”

Geoffrey sighed. His mustache, usually primly waxed, was askew. He rubbed his handkerchief under his nose. The handkerchief resembled the mustache in its dishevelment.

“Thirteen.”

He did the accounting in his mind: A gallon of fluid for every fifty pounds. Thirteen, at, say, 165 pounds each. “No,” he muttered. “Enid Bag. She’s near three hundred. Better say 180 pounds each. “That’s . . . thirty-six gallons. Thirty-six. And he’d laid in only fifty gallons for the week. “I’ll have to call in,” he said. “See if they can deliver the weekly allotment a bit earlier. And not skip next week.”

He washed his hands at the sink, turned off the tap, and dried his hands on a blackening rolling towel. “Oh, that’s filthy,” he said. Won’t do. Better call the laundry man.

He turned briskly, then paused. He’d have to choose his route carefully. Enid there, Percival Banks next to her. How he’d managed that with the feuds they’d had, he’d never know. Past Percival to Oliver and then between Thwaites and Smith to Bragg, then Stover, then Bragg Junior. Said, that, he thought. Two in one family, and a family that never had two pennies to rub together.

Small, then Jones. No, that was Jones, then Small. “I’d better put out place cards,” he thought. Don’t want Jones to see a Small in the casket at the service. That wouldn’t do at all. Then Arnold. Geoffrey frowned. He still didn’t have the teeth right. False teeth were always a bother, and it didn’t help that folks where used to seeing Arnold’s teeth in crooked. If he didn’t cock them the right way, his wife would be sure to fuss and probably have a fit and heave herself atop the casket and there is no way they’d both fit inside, and besides she still hadn’t paid for it.

Sprague and Thistlewhite to round out the baker’s dozen. By all rights Sprague and Thistlewhite should be buried side by side, he thought, they spent enough time together after their spouses died. Cruel Mr. Thistlewhite cold in the grave fifteen years now, and Madame Sprague gone now twelve. He’d never seen the living happier when they were married.

And he did see a lot, as undertaker. You knew all the feuds, the deceits, the hidden loves. Sometimes he drew tangled webs and Venn diagrams underneath the satin in the coffins, in case there was an accounting when the Trump sounded and God Almighty came and wanted to know what’s what. He didn’t want to rely on his memory alone.

What killed them all, no one seemed to know. That something had killed them, and almost all at once was clear. If all the bills came paid, he’d have the best quarter that Briggenmast Ltd had ever had, and Briggenmast had seen the village through two world wars and countless coal strikes. He hoped the doctor had an inkling. And had kept good records, as he lay there in a mahogany coffin with brass handles, between Mr. Percival and Mr. Thwaites. “Maybe I’ll check with the hospital, see if they have a record or two they want buried with the brave doctor,” he thought.

He took his coat off the hook, buttoned it closely, then gently removed his hat from the shelf, creased it, and placed it on his head. He pause for a moment to look in the mirror, winced, and for a quiet moment waxed his mustache and tweaked it back into propriety.

They’d meet at the pub at half past eight, they said, when the morning rounds started and the allotment of clients were delivered. He’d sent Brown and Cockrell home hours ago; Brown was ashen after four, Cockrell, dogged Cockrell, lasted through nine. They were good boys. Good assistants. But, he thought, quickening his pace as he walked up the uneven concrete sidewalk, unaccustomed to the volume. “Can’t be helped,” he said. “Can’t be helped.” Oh, it probably could, he added. But no one wanted to talk about it. Sometimes, those who did found themselves on the slab, and in need of a good wash and brush and a bit of reconstruction with wax and felt and glue and a bit of cotton wool. This was not a time for questions.

And the bills were almost always paid.

Thirteen.

Thirteen.

As he walked, a black van dashed by. He recognized the driver, who nodded as they passed.

He sighed. Blackburn, the night man, would have to let him in. Two coffins, he thought. I have only two coffins left. Must contact the coffin man, taciturn on the best days. One would think a man who sold furnishings for people whose occupants would never complain about burst stitching or scratches on the woodwork would be happier, but no. And for the last year, even worse.

Best not to think of it. Best not to think of it at all.

Shepherd’s pie, he thought. And a bit of apple, bread, and cheese. That will wash away the taste of the day. He hurried more as another van shot past.


Friday, January 6, 2023

Who's the Narc?

Maybe you'll remember this post, where I talk about ChatGPT and the horror it was set to rain over English departments everywhere.

But while most of us were either blissfully unaware of the impending Skynet doom to befall English departments, were actively cheering the AI writer on, or wringing our hands over the situation but not really doing anything about it, a Princeton student wrote a web thingy capable of detecting whether a piece of writing was written by artificial intelligence or not.

I'll let the Daily Beast and Buzzfeed go into the details.

I haven't had the opportunity to try this out yet, as the site hosting this web thingy hasn't been able to keep up with the demand. Or he's scraped enough personal data out of English teachers everywhere and is now only a bale of stolen underpants away from conquering the world. So once the smoke clears, I'll give this thing a shot and report back.

Wednesday, January 4, 2023

What A Way to Go

Reading in Robert Louis Taylor's biography of Winston Churchill, re the fate of a minor, hapless Churchill political ally.

Says Taylor:

"[James Mawdsley] was an enormous man and had been gaining a little more weight each year. A large china tub in which he was accustomed to bathing had at last collapsed under the growing avoirdupois and Mawdsley was destroyed in the wreckage."

Wikipedia is less colorful: "Mawdsley died in 1902 at Taunton, Ashton-under-Lyne from complications following an accident. His injuries were sustained by sitting in a china bath and breaking it."

(Wikipedia quotes another Churchill biographer, Roy Jenkins, in the matter.)

I've written about this book before. After hearing of Churchill's exploits during the Boer War of 1900, I begin to see why Michael Palin and Terry Jones saw such rich material in British history for their parody series, Ripping Yarns. Churchill could have featured in an entire season of the show, with little embellishment necessary.


(Just wanted the intro, but apparently it's not available solo on YouTube.)

Then there's William Howard Taft, luckier but perhaps more infamous.

Monday, January 2, 2023

Ancillary Activities Recommencing. Also, Work.


I don't actually mind that after eleven days off, I'm headed back to work tomorrow. "Heading back to work" involves shifting from one computer to another in the basement, so the "going" part isn't all that bad.

What's mildly frustrating is that this week, all the ancillary activities pick up as well: Young Men meetings on Tuesday night. Venture crew on Thursday, along with a committee meeting. And my second job, teaching at BYU-Idaho, also starts up again on Wednesday.

These are all good and necessary activities; it's just been nice to have a break from them for two weeks.

Sunday, January 1, 2023

Bah! Humbug.

Trying mightily to enjoy Les Standiford's "The Man Who Saved Christmas: How Charles Dickens's A Christmas Carol Rescued His Career and Revived Our Holiday Spirits,"  but I'm gonna say this: It reads pretty much like a Wikipedia article.

They turned the book into a movie, it seems:

Maybe it's good. And it might be, as it appears they've taken liberties with what Standiford wrote, incorporating bits of the actual book into the actual book (which Standiford's publishers tried by including "A Christmas Carol" under the same cover).

But I'll admit reading the book (Standiford's, not Dickens') I'm hard-pressed to see how anyone thought turning it into a movie would be a good idea. It's informatively dull and -- inexplicably -- leaves out the Muppet adaptation of the story as adaptations of the story are discussed.

I appreciate the factual approach. But it makes for dull reading.

Where it piqued my interest, ironically, was in its discussion of the piratical approach to authors' works at the time -- with no international copyright laws in place, nothing stopped Americans, for example, of printing A Christmas Carol, even under Dickens' name, and pocketing the profits, just as it profited British publishers from printing the work of Washington Irving and Edgar Allan Poe without sending a penny across the Atlantic. Seems others making parasitical living off the artistry of others isn't a new thing.