We also have a mountain of CDs, and in random drawers and boxes, some old audio cassettes, though those are going to go away as soon as I can get them transferred to my computer.
We have iPods and Kindles, and listen to a lot of digital music and watch a lot of movies on them. I’m also getting into ebooks, and hope to publish one of my own before the year is out.
But we’re not going out of our way to buy solely digital content.
Here’s why.
I keep seeing stories like this, where a consumer makes a digital-only purchase and then, later down the line, is denied use of the item purchased. Because they have no physical or backup copy of the item, they’re out the item and the money they used to buy it.
Until that stops, I’m not investing a lot of money in solely
digital content.
I know stories like this are the exception. That most people
enjoy their solely digital content, whether backed up at home or residing in
the cloud somewhere. But cumbersome as our collections are, I know that day or
night, come what may with the provider of said content, what I’ve got in my
house is mine, unless they want to come take it from me. Then they’d have to
get past the weenie dog, and I think she’s a pretty good deterrent.
Yes, the argument is made that if we suffer a fire, a flood,
or have some mishap (such as the aforementioned weenie dog scratching a DVD or
CD to the point it’s unplayable) that we lose that content as well. That is
true. However, there is a big difference in my mind between an accident or an
act of God and a random act of a copyright holder limiting my access to the
content I’ve purchased.
No comments:
Post a Comment