Funny thing about features. Or apps. Or web pages. Or books.
Or whatever else you can think to invent: People will use them in ways you
didn’t intend they be used.
Oh. Also: People are amazingly trusting and naïve when it
comes to technology. Myself included.
I am getting savvier. If, for example, I get a Facebook
friend request from someone I don’t know and have not interacted with on
Facebook, I don’t reply. That’s a big leap from my years on Twitter when I
friended everyone who came long, to the point I decided to exit the
Twitterverse because of, shall we say, the perverts.
I have yet to receive an AstroSloth. Probably because I
don’t have a smartphone nor do I frequent Silicon Valley. But there’s a person
out there sharing AstroSloth pictures with random people using an Apple device
app meant to make it easier to share files with friends. Except this person is
sharing files with total strangers.
The most interesting part of the article (emphasis mine):
Did Apple ever envision people using it like this? I sure
hope so. I can tell you that at a recent technology conference, I happened to
be sitting a few feet away from a certain Apple executive and one of the
company's PR people. I fired up AirDrop out of curiosity and both their phones
immediately popped up, names included. During a break I ventured to ask why
he'd left the setting on, and he told me it was to make it easier to share
things with friends, and that he just left it on that way. When I told him what
I used it for, I got a stern look of disapproval. Maybe they didn't think this through.
Of course they didn’t think it through. Perhaps they did
have some employees sitting there in development meetings thinking “You know, I
could use this feature to send sloth pictures to random people!” But that
person either didn’t speak up or was roundly shouted down when the subject came
up. And that’s a foolish thing to do. Because users are creative people.
And the problem doesn’t end with AstroSloth pictures. What
if, for example, someone used this feature to send photos meant to sexually
harass the receiver? Or harass the receiver in any way not connected with
innocently sending sloth photos? Of course, even the receiver of the sloth
photo should smile – or at least not be overly annoyed – for AstroSloth to come
across innocently. Yes, people should be more savvy with their devices – that
would be the ideal fix. Don’t want people sending you sloth photos? De-activate
the feature while in public. Or device makers could set up the feature in a way
to allow it only to accept content from people the user identifies as
trustworthy. And maybe it does – I don’t know; I do not have an Apple product
nor have I activated similar features on my Kindle. At least I think I haven’t.
I’d better check. Nope, I have not activated any such feature on my Kindle
Fire. Though I could. Easily. But I’m not going to. Because I have other ways
to do that kind of thing that don’t open me to every AstroSloth sender out
there.
No comments:
Post a Comment